Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: novnov <novnovice(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored?
Date: 2007-05-30 02:29:12
Message-ID: 20070530022912.GA73504@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:18:42PM -0700, novnov wrote:
> It seems that at least in the way I've written the function below, ORDER BY
> is ignored.

Works here (see below). Can you post a complete example that shows
ORDER BY being ignored? Do you get different results from the
cursor than if you execute the same query directly? What version
of PostgreSQL are you running?

CREATE TABLE t_item (
item_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
item_name text NOT NULL,
item_org_id integer NOT NULL,
item_active boolean NOT NULL
);

INSERT INTO t_item VALUES (4, 'four', 1, true);
INSERT INTO t_item VALUES (2, 'two', 1, true);
INSERT INTO t_item VALUES (1, 'one', 1, true);
INSERT INTO t_item VALUES (3, 'three', 1, true);

BEGIN;

SELECT proc_item_list(1, true);
proc_item_list
--------------------
<unnamed portal 1>
(1 row)

FETCH ALL FROM "<unnamed portal 1>";
item_id | item_name | item_org_id | item_active
---------+-----------+-------------+-------------
1 | one | 1 | t
2 | two | 1 | t
3 | three | 1 | t
4 | four | 1 | t
(4 rows)

COMMIT;

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Reyes 2007-05-30 02:35:09 Re: Delete with subquery deleting all records
Previous Message Naz Gassiep 2007-05-30 02:13:16 Re: TimeZone List