From: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: cluster test |
Date: | 2007-05-25 21:21:15 |
Message-ID: | 20070525212115.GA7693@mcknight.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:09:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This is in the regression database after a completed regression run, so
> it's possible that it's a bit different state from what's seen at the
> instant the cluster test was running, but it sure looks like the
> "expected" results are what you get from a seqscan. Would you force a
> seqscan and see what EXPLAIN shows as the cost on your machine?
I have appended the relevant parts of the modified cluster script.
I haven't pointed out clear enough that I'm running this against a fresh
database cluster, no vacuum, no other databases, no config changes, just initdb,
postmaster startup and installcheck. I usually have es_ES(at)euro here but I
get the same with locale C.
Feel free to ask for more output.
Oh, btw, its a regular 32bit box as well.
Joachim
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
cluster.out | text/plain | 1.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-25 21:58:58 | Re: cluster test |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-25 20:36:59 | Re: Seq scans status update |