| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing |
| Date: | 2007-05-18 13:53:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20070518135317.GB6695@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > >Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > >>Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>- heap page diagnostic functions
> > >>
> > >>I would like to take this review (after PGCon).
> > >
> > >Too late, Bruce applied it already :).
> >
> > Yes ... Never mind
>
> You know, the fact that it was applied does not mean that it doesn't
> need review. If there is a bug on it which your review can find, we
> would like to know before it is released.
>
> The review process is not just so that it can be flown past some evil
> committee.
I forgot to add that it seems that a general feeling here is that as
soon as code is committed, it is Tom Lane's problem if there is a bug,
because he will track it down and fix it. So if it was committed, we
can forget about it because he'll take care.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/
"Granting software the freedom to evolve guarantees only different results,
not better ones." (Zygo Blaxell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-18 13:54:59 | Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-18 13:50:05 | Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing |