Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Cui Shijun <rancpine(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing
Date: 2007-05-17 13:22:17
Message-ID: 200705171322.l4HDMHJ11626@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Cui Shijun <rancpine(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I want to help the reviewing work of "ctid chain following enhancement ".
> > I've been studying the souce code which related with that part recently.
> > :-)
>
>
>
> Tom had objected to this patch on the grounds that it adds complexity
> without any significant gains. Though I don't completely agree with the
> first part, the second part is indeed debatable since the code is touched
> only
> for infrequently.

Right. The reason the patch was kept in the queue is that there was
discussion that HOT will exercise that part of the code a lot more than
it does currently.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-05-17 13:24:07 Re: BufFileWrite across MAX_PHYSICAL_FILESIZE boundary
Previous Message NikhilS 2007-05-17 13:09:15 Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support