From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing |
Date: | 2007-05-17 01:04:27 |
Message-ID: | 200705170104.l4H14RA05227@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 5/16/07, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> > Set a fixed date (ie. 3 weeks) and whatever isn't in gets punted to 8.4 ... if
> > that means those 'large patches' don't get applied, so be it ...
>
> I disagree with that approach. Larger more complex patches required
> much more work and effort than small, simple ones. Not only do I
> think it's unfair to the authors who spent considerably more time on
> their work, but I think it also sets a bad precedent for future work;
> saying, in short, that if you want to make large strides to improve
> PostgreSQL, and you followed the community development process, you're
> still potentially last in line for review.
Yep. We lose a lot of credibility if we did that.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-17 01:05:08 | Re: Stats not updated after rollback -- autovacuum confused. |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-05-17 01:04:26 | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |