| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Autovacuum and XID wraparound |
| Date: | 2007-05-16 21:41:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20070516214130.GN4582@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> >>> How about freezing anything older than vacuum_freeze_min_age, just like
> >>> VACUUM does?
> >>
> >> I suppose that'd be OK, but is it likely to be worth the trouble?
>
> > I think so, because it means that people using CLUSTER to keep the size
> > of tables in line instead of VACUUM, would not need the otherwise
> > mandatory VACUUM.
>
> Fair enough. Who will fix the already-applied patch?
I'm on it.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-16 22:46:27 | Re: [DOCS] Autovacuum and XID wraparound |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-16 21:30:51 | Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-16 22:46:27 | Re: [DOCS] Autovacuum and XID wraparound |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-16 21:20:56 | Re: [DOCS] Autovacuum and XID wraparound |