From: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |
Date: | 2007-05-16 14:29:41 |
Message-ID: | 20070516142941.GC3672@www.trapp.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:03:47AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de wrote:
[...]
> There is just one remaining problem: Outlook and derivatives don't set
> the In-Reply-To: nor References: headers. This breaks the threads (the
> best the software can do is group the messages by subject, but it works
> only partially).
>
> I've tried a coupld of times to decode how the Thread-Id stuff works,
> which is what Outlook seems to use, but I haven't been able to detect a
> pattern.
Heh. Seems to be a well-known problem:
<http://osdir.com/ml/discuss/2003-10/threads.html#00194>
Ackthpttp.
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGSxVVBcgs9XrR2kYRAsRrAJ9GC7fHJgaS424yoylnzB/9YPtE/wCbBCRE
C62mzkj1BVXKlIau0TKlOS4=
=GVAM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-16 14:32:15 | Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert |
Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2007-05-16 14:19:44 | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |