Re: PQprepare question

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQprepare question
Date: 2007-05-12 11:35:35
Message-ID: 20070512113535.GA4620@feivel.credativ.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:52:55AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd vote that way if you haven't accepted it in the past. Otherwise
> you'll need some kind of compromise for backward compatibility ...

In the past ecpg not only accepted "?" as placeholder but also created
it! This is what I was talking about, to not create those placeholders
anymore. As far as user supplied placehodlers are concerned I agree that
we need some backward compatibility. I think the best way is to
implement a command line option to enable the old behaviour.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Tester 2007-05-12 15:26:22 Trouble returning a text field from an SRF
Previous Message Joost Kraaijeveld 2007-05-12 09:32:08 Howto convert / (re)store xml column to table in trigger using contrib/xml2?