Re: Reducing stats collection overhead

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reducing stats collection overhead
Date: 2007-04-29 10:08:18
Message-ID: 200704291008.l3TA8JT27139@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Yes, it seems we will have to do something for 8.3.
>
> Yeah, we've kind of ignored any possible overhead of the stats mechanism
> for awhile, but I think we've got to face up to this if we're gonna have
> it on by default.
>
> > I assume the method
> > below would reduce frequent updates of the stats_command_string too.
>
> No, stats_command_string is entirely independent now.

Oh, right, we used shared memory. No wonder it isn't on the TODO list
anymore. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-04-29 10:25:17 Re: question for serial types with CHECK conditions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-29 07:27:16 Re: Reducing stats collection overhead