| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, usleepless(at)gmail(dot)com, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Date: | 2007-04-24 13:45:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20070424134515.GE15856@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:18:54AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2007 01:32, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > > That would be just because you don't know the numbering scheme. 8.2 to
> > > > 8.3 is considered "major" in these parts. See
> > > > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
> > >
> > > Is that official policy? I don't see any mention of it in the docs.
> >
> > Are you somehow suggesting that our website isn't official? Where did you
> > get that idea?
> >
>
> Website information can often be of a transient nature, with no history of
> changes or even the existence of information. Documentation is a little more
> permanent, and at least offers a record of agreement at a specific point in
> time.
Well, there is cvs history. But I see your point. Doesn't make it any less
official, though, just transient.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-04-24 14:24:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-04-24 13:18:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-24 14:10:03 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3244: problem with PREPARE |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-04-24 13:22:41 | Re: TODO idea - implicit constraints across child tables with a common column as primary key (but obviously not a shared index) |