| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, usleepless(at)gmail(dot)com, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Date: | 2007-04-24 13:18:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200704240918.54598.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 01:32, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > That would be just because you don't know the numbering scheme. 8.2 to
> > > 8.3 is considered "major" in these parts. See
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
> >
> > Is that official policy? I don't see any mention of it in the docs.
>
> Are you somehow suggesting that our website isn't official? Where did you
> get that idea?
>
Website information can often be of a transient nature, with no history of
changes or even the existence of information. Documentation is a little more
permanent, and at least offers a record of agreement at a specific point in
time.
> As for inclusion in the docs I beleive we're still waiting for your
> patch...
>
We'll see :-)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-04-24 13:45:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Previous Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2007-04-24 10:48:46 | T-shirts situation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-04-24 13:22:41 | Re: TODO idea - implicit constraints across child tables with a common column as primary key (but obviously not a shared index) |
| Previous Message | Golden Liu | 2007-04-24 12:54:01 | Google SoC: column-level privilege subsystem |