Re: Status of Postgres 8.2.4 and pg_standby

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tf(at)o(dot)ptimized(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Status of Postgres 8.2.4 and pg_standby
Date: 2007-04-18 17:44:37
Message-ID: 200704181744.l3IHibq23745@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
> On Apr 17, 6:56 pm, b(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)momjian(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
> > CAJ CAJ wrote:
> > > Hello,
> >
> > > What is the ETA of postgresql 6.2.4? Also, will pg_standby make
> it to
> > > 8.2.xbranch?
> >
> > pg_standby will not be in 8.2.X. It is a new feature.
>
> As I understand it, though, pg_standby as distributed in contrib for
> 8.3 is designed to be backward compatible with 8.2.x.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2007-04/msg00069.php
>
> I'm currently having good success in testing.

We don't backpatch features to stable releases. That is why it will not
appear in 8.2.X.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2007-04-18 18:21:21 Re: question
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-04-18 16:32:31 Re: Disadvantages on having too many page slots?