Re: Vista/IPv6

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vista/IPv6
Date: 2007-04-12 10:11:18
Message-ID: 20070412101118.GG16892@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:58:26AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 09:04 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> > The point is still what happens when you distribute a binary built on a
> > system with ipv6 to a system that doesn't have it.
>
> I think the problem is that you appear to have an ambiguous and overly coarse
> definition of a "system with ipv6".

Possibly :-) I just want to make sure it doesn't break for our end users,
no matter what the definition is.

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-04-12 10:14:43 Re: Vista/IPv6
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD 2007-04-12 09:49:21 Re: Eliminating unnecessary left joins