Re: BUG #3048: pg_dump dumps intarray metadata incorrectly

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dmitry Koterov <d(at)koterov(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: BUG #3048: pg_dump dumps intarray metadata incorrectly
Date: 2007-04-09 19:05:08
Message-ID: 20070409190508.GK10785@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >Tom Lane wrote:
> >>Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >>>Tom, do you want this fixed for 8.2.X?
> >>
> >>>Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>>Yeah. I'd say that intarray's attempt to override the default status of
> >>>>the built-in gin opclass is simply a bad idea and should be removed.
> >>
> >>I don't recall having seen a response from Oleg or Teodor, and would
> >>like their input before making a final decision --- but at the moment
> >>I think we should take that out.
> >
> >Oleg or Teodor, I need a comment on this.
>
> We agree with Tom in this case and we'll remove update of
> system catalog. But, I want to rise the problem again - pg_dump doesn't
> track changes of system catalog. The problem could be more pronounced in
> case of built-in FTS, if somebody with superuser rights changes
> fts configurations in system catalog.

But it should dump them as "ALTER whatever" commands, right?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2007-04-10 14:09:25 Re: BUG #3048: pg_dump dumps intarray metadata incorrectly
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2007-04-06 17:45:27 Re: BUG #3048: pg_dump dumps intarray metadata incorrectly