Re: Make CLUSTER MVCC-safe

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Make CLUSTER MVCC-safe
Date: 2007-04-03 01:09:15
Message-ID: 200704030109.l3319F109560@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Here's an update, fixing conflict by Tom's recent commit of Simon's
> >> patch to skip WAL-inserts when archiving is not enabled.
> >
> > Hmm, wouldn't it be better if the rewriteheap.c file was in
> > access/heap/ instead of commands/?
>
> Yeah, maybe. I thought of it as a subsystem of cluster, and possibly
> other commands like alter table. But it really is pretty low-level.

So, does the patch need adjustment? Should we move it before
application?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-04-03 01:16:51 Re: index support is NULL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-04-03 01:06:17 Re: ecpg threading vs win32