Re: scan_recycle_buffers

Where is the final version of this patch? What patches are stuck in the
patch moderator queue?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 07:59 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 18:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> We do that anyway; but certainly Simon's patch ought not be injecting
> > > >> an additional one.
> > >
> > > > It should be possible to pass that down from the planner to the
> > > > executor, in certain cases.
> > >
> > > Huh? See HeapScanDesc->rs_nblocks.
> >
> > Many thanks.
>
> New patch enclosed, implementation as you've requested.
>
> Not ready to apply yet, but good for testing.
>
> COPY command now also uses this hint, to allow test results and
> discussion. Others could also, perhaps needing different values.
>
> --
> Simon Riggs
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +