From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |
Date: | 2007-03-28 17:11:05 |
Message-ID: | 20070328171105.GF32384@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
David Fetter wrote:
> The first is in type_sanity, which basically doesn't understand that
> complex types now have array types associated with them and thinks
> they're orphan array types, so it's actually the test that's not
> right.
Hmm, I question the usefulness of automatically creating array types for
all relation types that are created -- the catalog bloat seems a bit too
much. An array of pg_autovacuum for example, does that make sense?
I'm not sure what was the reaction to having an "CREATE TYPE foo ARRAY
OF bar" command of some kind? I think this was discussed but not
explicitely rejected, or was it?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-03-28 17:12:52 | Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-03-28 16:57:38 | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-03-28 17:33:56 | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-03-28 16:57:38 | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |