From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HOT - preliminary results |
Date: | 2007-03-02 20:52:47 |
Message-ID: | 200703022052.l22KqlA05071@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
> >>> accounts 157895 (initial size) 49284 (increase)
> >>> accounts_pkey 19709 (initial size) 19705 (increase)
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Just to clarify, the relation size and increase is in number
> >> of blocks.
> >
> > The numbers are quite impressive :-) Have you removed the selects on
> > accounts too ?
>
> Yes. In the first set of results, SELECT on accounts is removed.
>
> > Seems that should also show improvements.
> >
> > Do you prune chains during update also ?
>
> Yes, we do prune the chains during UPDATE, but only when we
> run out of free space and LP_DELETEd items on the page.
> And we prune all chains on the page in that case.
Yep, that seems the most efficient approach.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-02 20:53:24 | Re: HOT - preliminary results |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-02 20:52:20 | Re: HOT - preliminary results |