| From: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Subject: | Re: SOC & user quotas |
| Date: | 2007-02-28 22:48:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20070228224838.GA3553@mcknight.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:56:13PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It hasn't ever made it onto the TODO list, which means there's not a
> consensus that we need it.
Such a patch could improve the acceptance of PostgreSQL in shared hosting
environments. Note that a database without quotas can be filled up easily
and the database will stop serving requests to other users' databases.
There is a quota implementation already in the archives but I don't know
more about it than that it exists:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-07/msg00392.php
Joachim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergey E. Koposov | 2007-02-28 23:01:22 | Re: SOC & user quotas |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-02-28 22:36:38 | Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option |