| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Subject: | Re: SOC & user quotas |
| Date: | 2007-02-28 22:26:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20070228222648.GE3157@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:57:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's worse than that, because VACUUM FULL will actually bloat the
> indexes on the way to being able to reduce the table size (since it has
> to make new index entries for rows it moves). If the limit is strictly
I was thinking that indexes and temp tables wouldn't be counted. I
thought it was more of a "stop people using up lots of disk space"
rather than specifically stopping at a hard limit.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-28 22:29:52 | Re: SOC & user quotas |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-02-28 22:14:24 | Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview |