| From: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Position of a field |
| Date: | 2007-02-27 13:08:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20070227130817.GF14945@a-kretschmer.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support pgsql-sql |
am Tue, dem 27.02.2007, um 9:48:57 -0300 mailte Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha folgendes:
> I understant you inquiry but I don't meant to add all the fields order
> in an insert statement.
>
> IE:
> insert into table values (value1, value2, value3....)
>
> is better than
>
> insert into table (column1,column2,column3 ...) values (value1,
> value2, value3....)
No, it isn't better, because, if you change the table in the future and
add new colums, your insert-statement will be failed. If you write your
insert with explicit column order, nothing happens, except the new row
will be empty.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2007-02-27 22:48:25 | Re: Slony scripts |
| Previous Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-02-27 12:48:57 | Re: Position of a field |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Midgley | 2007-02-27 16:38:56 | Re: Change the Default Database |
| Previous Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-02-27 12:48:57 | Re: Position of a field |