Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date: 2007-02-26 15:21:23
Message-ID: 200702261521.l1QFLNm21346@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
> > comments.
>
> The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with
> Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use
> this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar
> interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".

I don't use Solaris so I don't know if it is frequent issue or not.
I assume the author knows.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-26 17:43:12 Re: BUG #3079: pg_dump doesn't dump datascheme with uppercase letters in
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-26 14:46:24 Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-02-26 17:33:13 1-byte packed varlena headers
Previous Message NikhilS 2007-02-26 13:36:37 Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum