| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Warren Turkal <wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SCMS question |
| Date: | 2007-02-23 20:13:33 |
| Message-ID: | 200702232013.l1NKDXE28742@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> You're still merging patches and reviewing patches by hand, without any of the
> tools to, for example, view incremental changes in the branch, view the logs
> of the branch, merge the branch into the code automatically taking into
> account the known common ancestor. Instead of receiving a 20k patch without
> any tools to work with it you would be given a branch name and be able to view
> and merge it into the main branch using the tools.
I don't see this as a win. I understand the ability to see the patch as
separate revisions by the user, but for patch application, we really
need to see the diff -c of the entire patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-23 20:29:41 | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Update Solaris FAQ. |
| Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-02-23 20:07:56 | Re: Priorities for users or queries? |