Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrej Ricnik-Bay <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Brandon Aiken <BAiken(at)winemantech(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)
Date: 2007-02-23 05:13:54
Message-ID: 20070223001354.406db4cd.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> > Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
> > > On 2/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
> > >> That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
> > >> as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
> > >> scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
> > > I think I recall that wikipedia uses MySQL ... they get quite a few
> > > hits, too, I believe.
> >
> > And outages if you watch :)
>
> Does this mean that we believe the Wikipedia would not suffer any
> outages if it ran on Postgres?
>
> How is the Postgres port of the Wikipedia doing this days anyway? Is it
> in a shape where one would consider it "competitive"?

I installed wikipgdia for the WPLUG wiki:
http://wplug.ece.cmu.edu/wiki/

We haven't had a lick of trouble with it since it went up. I don't
believe it's experienced any downtime in many months.

--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-02-23 05:23:41 Re: postgresql vs mysql
Previous Message John Smith 2007-02-23 05:13:04 Re: postgresql vs mysql