| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Date: | 2007-02-22 07:13:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200702220813.57333.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> This is like the third time we have been around this problem. The
> syntax is clear and reasonable imo.
But others have differing opinions.
> Can we stop arguing about it and just include? If there are specific
> issues beyond syntax that is one
> thing, but that this point it seems we are arguing for the sake of
> arguing.
How is that worse than wanting to abort the discussion for the sake of
aborting the discussion?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-22 07:20:49 | Re: infinity and DATE type |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-02-22 07:12:43 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2007-02-22 07:29:04 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-02-22 07:12:43 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |