From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3) |
Date: | 2007-02-20 23:39:12 |
Message-ID: | 200702202339.l1KNdC603604@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO:
* Consider decreasing the amount of memory used by PrivateRefCount
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00797.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-01/msg00752.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 14:42 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > int8 still seems like overkjll. When will the ref counts go above 2 on a
> > > regular basis? Surely refcount=2 is just chance at the best of times.
> > >
> > > Refcount -> 2 bits per value, plus a simple overflow list? That would
> > > allow 0,1,2 ref counts plus 3 means look in hashtable to find real
> > > refcount.
> >
> > At two bits, would we run into contention for the byte by multiple
> > backends?
>
> No contention, its a private per-backend data structure. That's why we
> want to reduce the size of it so badly.
>
> --
> Simon Riggs
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2007-02-20 23:46:33 | xpath_array with namespaces support |
Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-02-20 23:19:06 | Re: Priorities for users or queries? |