Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
Date: 2007-02-20 06:36:54
Message-ID: 200702200136.54854.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday 19 February 2007 15:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:33:24AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> > >>> Somehow this seems like implementing RAID within postgres,
> > >>
> > >> RAID and LVM too. I can't get excited about re-inventing those wheels
> > >> when perfectly good implementations already exist for us to sit on top
> > >> of.
> > >
> > > Ok, warning, this is a "you know what would be sweet" moment.
> >
> > The dreaded words from a developers mouth to every manager in the world.
>
> Yea, I just instinctively hit "delete" when I saw that phrase.

Too bad... I know oracle can do what he wants... possibly other db systems as
well.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-02-20 06:38:14 HOT WIP Patch - version 2
Previous Message FAST PostgreSQL 2007-02-20 05:44:54 Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements