From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes |
Date: | 2007-02-20 06:36:54 |
Message-ID: | 200702200136.54854.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 19 February 2007 15:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:33:24AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> > >>> Somehow this seems like implementing RAID within postgres,
> > >>
> > >> RAID and LVM too. I can't get excited about re-inventing those wheels
> > >> when perfectly good implementations already exist for us to sit on top
> > >> of.
> > >
> > > Ok, warning, this is a "you know what would be sweet" moment.
> >
> > The dreaded words from a developers mouth to every manager in the world.
>
> Yea, I just instinctively hit "delete" when I saw that phrase.
Too bad... I know oracle can do what he wants... possibly other db systems as
well.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-02-20 06:38:14 | HOT WIP Patch - version 2 |
Previous Message | FAST PostgreSQL | 2007-02-20 05:44:54 | Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements |