Re: pg_proc without oid?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_proc without oid?
Date: 2007-02-19 16:34:03
Message-ID: 20070219163403.GP28395@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 16:50 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > Well, in the first place Gen_fmgrtab.sh is producing garbage:
>
> Uh, ok, that needs fixing.
>
> > In the second place, if you don't want to predetermine OIDs for your
> > functions then they shouldn't be in hardwired pg_proc.h rows at all.
>
> Where else would you put them?

But _why_ wouldn't you want to have fixed OIDs for the functions? I'm
not seeing the benefit.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-19 16:43:22 Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-02-19 16:27:51 Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes