Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Date: 2007-02-16 15:35:26
Message-ID: 200702161535.l1GFZQS20832@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian escribi?:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Andrew Dunstan escribi?:
> > >
> > > > Looks to me like the timestamptz test relies on the timestamp test (for
> > > > timestamp_tbl) but they are set to run in parallel, so we have a race
> > > > condition. Oops!
> > >
> > > Good catch :-)
> > >
> > > I'd guess the answer is to move the tests using the timestamp_tbl to the
> > > timestamp test.
> >
> > OK, will do. Thanks for the diagnosis.
>
> Actually I have a patch ready for it.

OK, thanks, I will not do anything.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-02-16 15:40:59 Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-02-16 15:32:47 Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates