Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: FAST PostgreSQL <fastpgs(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
Date: 2007-02-16 05:01:15
Message-ID: 20070216050115.GA29933@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> "FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Why not output the data in COPY format instead?
>
> > Yeah, that was my initial idea too... But because the TODO item clearly
> > mentions INSERT, I thought maybe there was some very specific reason for the
> > output to be in INSERT stmts.. ..
>
> I don't think the TODO entry was particularly carefully thought out.

... which is why discussing stuff in -hackers *before* coding tends to
be a good idea.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yoshiyuki Asaba 2007-02-16 05:09:41 Re: pg_restore fails with a custom backup file
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-16 04:55:53 Re: Avg performance for int8/numeric

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-16 05:05:42 Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-16 04:58:05 Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates