| From: | Sean Davis <sdavis2(at)mail(dot)nih(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Gustavo" <gustavor(at)intercomgi(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Help whit schemas |
| Date: | 2007-02-12 12:19:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200702120719.32453.sdavis2@mail.nih.gov |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Monday 12 February 2007 05:58, Gustavo wrote:
> Dear Postgre users,
>
>
> Im from Argentina and I have a question.
>
> im development a client-server application and i have a performance dude. I
> have a Db whit 10 tables. The server could attend a lot of clients at the
> same time and every client use this tables to insert rows. Every client is
> independent of the rest (dont share information). I want to know if is
> convenient create one schema for every user (10 tables from schema) or
> every users sharing the same schema (only 10 tables) Every user could
> insert a lot of rows per table.
Without more information, it is impossible to comment fully. However, I would
generally use a single schema unless the data for each user is completely
private to that user.
Sean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas | 2007-02-12 14:11:50 | Re: Help whit schemas |
| Previous Message | Gustavo | 2007-02-12 10:58:41 | Help whit schemas |