| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
| Date: | 2007-02-08 09:27:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20070208092753.GT64372@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:16:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> > On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... massive expansion of the tests doesn't seem justified
>
> > What about the idea that's been floated in the past about a --
> > extensive mode for regression testing that would (generally) only be
> > used by the build farm. That would mean others wouldn't have to
> > suffer through extremely long make check's.
>
> > Or is there another reason not to expand the tests?
>
> I'm not concerned so much about the runtime as the development and
> maintenance effort...
I can see development... but are there enough changes where the
maintenance would be an issue?
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2007-02-08 09:35:47 | Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-02-08 09:20:59 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce WAL activity for page splits: > Currently, an index split |