Re: replication choices

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replication choices
Date: 2007-02-06 16:43:35
Message-ID: 20070206164335.GF26733@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:17:40PM -0800, Ben wrote:
> the remote sites back to the central site, each remote site needs to have
> a normal slony node first, which I don't have the hardware for.

An answer for this, though a dirty kludge, is to replicate to another
database in the same cluster. This is really no more load than the
single replication user, although it is expensive at the disk level.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2007-02-06 16:52:33 Re: Postgres SQL Syntax
Previous Message Hannes Dorbath 2007-02-06 16:41:43 Re: Help compile pgmemcache against PG 8.2