From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Switching to mailman (Re: [Fwd: NDN: Re: [ODBC] Connect without queries?]) |
Date: | 2007-02-06 16:01:58 |
Message-ID: | 20070206160158.GC26733@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 07:10:21AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> Mailman is pretty much the defacto mailing list software out there. It
> is used in extremely large installations including sites such as
> SourceForge. It has an active community. Heck it even has a freenode
> channel that people talk on.
Uh. MySQL is pretty much the _de facto_ free DBMS out there. It is
used in extremely large installations, including sites such as
Slashdot. It is also supported by Oracle. It has an active
community, and a company behind it.
I don't think this style of argument is one I'm going to buy.
> of laziness more than anything. Other than that, I see no reason not to
> move to Mailman.
One reason I can think is that I've had mailman installations brought
to their knees by high volumes of mail. At a previous site where we
used it and mj, I never had that happen with mj. I dunno about mj2.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-02-06 16:08:56 | Re: How to coordinate web team for security releases? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-02-06 15:42:11 | Re: Re: Majordomo2 (Was: Re: Switching to mailman (Re: [Fwd: NDN: Re: [ODBC]) Connect without queries?]) |