Re: Index split WAL reduction

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index split WAL reduction
Date: 2007-02-04 00:01:00
Message-ID: 200702040001.l14010p26420@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Sorry, please disregard. Newer patch being added.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
> and approves it.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Here's an updated patch that fixes a bug with full_page_writes, and an
> > alignment issue in replay code. Also added a new test case to
> > crashtest.sh that exercises the fixed bug.
> >
> > Has anyone looked at this? I now consider it ready for committing, if
> > no-one sees a problem with it.
> >
> > Here's the original description of the patch:
> >
> > > Currently, an index split writes all the data on the split page to
> > > WAL. That's a lot of WAL traffic. The tuples that are copied to the
> > > right page need to be WAL logged, but the tuples that stay on the
> > > original page don't.
> > >
> > > Here's a patch to do that. It needs further testing, I have used the
> > > attached crude crashtest.sh to test the basics, but we need to test
> > > the more obscure cases like splitting non-leaf or root page.
> > >
> > > On a test case that inserts 10000 rows in increasing key order with a
> > > 100 characters wide text-field as key, the patch reduced the total
> > > generated WAL traffic from 45MB to 33MB, or ~ 25%. Your mileage may
> > > vary, depending on the tuple and key sizes, and the order of inserts.
> >
> > --
> > Heikki Linnakangas
> > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> [ application/x-shellscript is not supported, skipping... ]
>
>
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chad Wagner 2007-02-04 00:01:40 Re: date comparisons
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-04 00:00:01 Re: Index split WAL reduction