| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches |
| Date: | 2007-02-02 17:42:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20070202124247.428960df.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
In response to "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>
> >> But it's also important to point out that a number of community
> >> members are on the hook to support old versions due to their day
> >> jobs; with Tom/Red Hat/7.3 (or is it 7.4?) probably being the best
> >> example. IIRC Sun's support policy is 5 years, so presumably someone
> >> will have to maintain whatever version they initially shipped with
> >> (8.1?) for quite some time as well.
> >
> > Right. and my original point in starting this thread is that it would
> > be valuable to the community if all this information were gathered up
> > and documented somewhere.
>
> Go for it! :)
I suppose I should have seen that coming ... :)
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rohit Prakash Khare | 2007-02-02 17:57:38 | Can a database be restored successfully after new installation. |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-02 17:32:55 | Re: DBMS Engines and Performance |