Re: Lock compatibility matrix

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Date: 2007-01-30 10:09:01
Message-ID: 200701301109.02982.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> I had this in a different form, but reworked so that it matches the
> doc patch that Teodor submitted earlier. I think it would be good to
> have this information in the lock.h file as well.

Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same information?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guido Goldstein 2007-01-30 10:43:52 Re: pgsql: Fix for plpython functions; return true/false for boolean,
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-01-30 09:52:32 Lock compatibility matrix