Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql?

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>
To: Furface <furface(at)omnicode(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql?
Date: 2007-01-28 18:21:09
Message-ID: 20070128132109.6bac33eb.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Furface <furface(at)omnicode(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Tom. You know I thought about this approach a little more. I
> don't think there's a simple answer to this security problem short of
> placing a proxy server application between the clients and the
> database. The problem with giving database role accounts to each and
> every user is that the users now have uncontrolled access to the
> database.

Ummm ... huh?

PostgreSQL has a pretty nice security model that gives you a great deal
of control over what users have access to:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/user-manag.html

The only thing that's missing is row-level granularity. There's at least
one project out there supporting that, and you can also simulate it with
clever usage of stored procedures and the ability to run them with the
permissions of the definer instead of the executer.

-Bill

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2007-01-28 18:24:37 Re: Firing triggers based on certain Insert conditions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-28 18:20:16 Re: Firing triggers based on certain Insert conditions