Re: Change draft gmake control

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change draft gmake control
Date: 2007-01-27 22:47:01
Message-ID: 200701272247.l0RMl1t13872@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Well, if 'draft' was only for html, I could see suggesting just 'gmake
> > draft', but 'draft' can be used for Postscript and PDF too.
>
> But those aren't cases where saving some typing is useful (in fact,
> I'd bet money that no one will ever use them). Draft runs with html
> output are highly useful, and like Peter I think "make draft" ought
> to work for that.

OK, if that's what people want. Patch attached and applied, docs
updated.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/diff text/x-diff 1.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Schmidt 2007-01-28 01:26:45 Password issue revisited
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-27 21:19:16 Re: Change draft gmake control

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-27 22:53:42 Re: DROP FUNCTION failure: cache lookup failed for relation X
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-27 21:19:16 Re: Change draft gmake control