From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: vacuum process taking more than 33 hours |
Date: | 2007-01-15 14:53:16 |
Message-ID: | 20070115145316.GC13011@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:44:15PM +0000, Ezequiel Luis Pellettieri wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Why don't you try droping all indexes exept but the constraints ones for
> each table.
I don't have the problem, so I don't know whether that will help.
> then you'll free aprox half of DB size. then re-create indexes, one by one.
> and finally you can perform a full vacuum.
>
> that worked for me. :)
On some versions of Postgres, it will, but AFAIK the latest versions
don't have the same index bloat problems. Moreover, if your vacuum
regime is right, you should _never_ have to VACUUM FULL.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir?
--attr. John Maynard Keynes
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | William Scott Jordan | 2007-01-15 21:26:04 | Referencing tables are grinding UPDATE to a halt |
Previous Message | Ezequiel Luis Pellettieri | 2007-01-15 14:44:15 | Re: vacuum process taking more than 33 hours |