Re: Planner statistics, correlations

From: Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>, Peter Childs <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planner statistics, correlations
Date: 2007-01-12 10:44:22
Message-ID: 20070112104422.GD9703@oppetid.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

[Heikki Linnakangas - Fri at 10:41:34AM +0000]
> I thought about partitioning the table by state, putting rows with
> state=4 into one partition, and all others to another partition.

That sounds like a good idea - but wouldn't that be costly when changing state?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-01-12 10:55:40 Re: Planner statistics, correlations
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-01-12 10:41:34 Re: Planner statistics, correlations