Re: pg_ctl options

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl options
Date: 2007-01-06 22:18:33
Message-ID: 200701062218.l06MIXW06453@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Added to TODO:

* Make consistent use of long/short command options --- pg_ctl needs
long ones, pg_config doesn't have short ones, postgres doesn't have
enough long ones, etc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> I notice that quite a few pg_ctl options have no long form equivalents,
> namely these: NopPwW
>
> Also, none of the long forms seems to be documented at all.
>
> Should this be cleared up (maybe a nice first project for lurking new
> contributors)?\
>
> If we don't want long forms for some reason, then a comment in the code
> saying why would make sense.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-06 22:28:39 Re: [PATCHES] Patch to log usage of temporary files
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-06 22:06:36 Re: Mark/Restore and avoiding RandomAccess sorts