Re: 8.3 pending patch queue

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Date: 2007-01-06 21:17:55
Message-ID: 200701062117.l06LHt526787@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
> and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
>
> There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
> up on either list. I haven't made a list of these, but they include
> major patches such as Grouped Item indexes and a number of others. Many
> of those are clearly marked as ready to apply/review/reject.
>
> Can I request that those be reviewed first? The unapplied patches list
> looks long and many things on it aren't even patches, AFAICS -
> presumably TODO items-in-waiting?
>
> Some minor points:
>
> [PATCHES] Incrementally Updated Backup, Simon Riggs
> has already been applied to 8.2
>
> [PATCHES] WAL logging freezing, Heikki Linnakangas
> has already been agreed/applied to 8.2

Thanks. These two items have been removed from the patches hold queue.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Marshall 2007-01-06 21:18:07 Re: [PATCHES] [Fwd: Index Advisor]
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-01-06 21:17:33 Re: 8.3 pending patch queue