From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Date: | 2007-01-06 21:17:55 |
Message-ID: | 200701062117.l06LHt526787@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
> and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
>
> There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
> up on either list. I haven't made a list of these, but they include
> major patches such as Grouped Item indexes and a number of others. Many
> of those are clearly marked as ready to apply/review/reject.
>
> Can I request that those be reviewed first? The unapplied patches list
> looks long and many things on it aren't even patches, AFAICS -
> presumably TODO items-in-waiting?
>
> Some minor points:
>
> [PATCHES] Incrementally Updated Backup, Simon Riggs
> has already been applied to 8.2
>
> [PATCHES] WAL logging freezing, Heikki Linnakangas
> has already been agreed/applied to 8.2
Thanks. These two items have been removed from the patches hold queue.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2007-01-06 21:18:07 | Re: [PATCHES] [Fwd: Index Advisor] |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-06 21:17:33 | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |