Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
Date: 2016-11-04 23:07:15
Message-ID: 2007.1478300835@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> writes:
>> Anyway, I have prepared a patch along the lines you suggest.

Pushed, we'll see if the buildfarm likes this iteration any better.

> It occurred to me that the documentation still suggests that you should
> add a declaration to a C function; I have fixed that too.

I didn't like that and rewrote it a bit. It's not specific to V1
functions.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-11-05 00:08:55 Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Previous Message Doug Doole 2016-11-04 22:25:58 Re: Improving executor performance