Re: [HACKERS] Enums patch v2

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enums patch v2
Date: 2006-12-19 14:58:48
Message-ID: 20061219145848.GK27098@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> As for efficiency, I agree with what Tom says about alignment and
> padding dissolving away any perceived advantage in most cases. If we
> ever get around to optimising record layout we could revisit it.

I don't, because there are always those that are knowledgeable enough to
know how to reduce space lost to padding. So it would be nice to have
2-byte enums on-disk, and resolve them based on the column's typid. But
then, I'm not familiar with the patch at all so I'm not sure if it's
possible.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-12-19 15:07:55 Re: pg_restore fails with a custom backup file
Previous Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig 2006-12-19 14:56:01 Re: Core dump in PL/pgSQL ...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-12-19 15:11:42 Re: [HACKERS] Enums patch v2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-19 14:45:38 Re: Updated XML patch