Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Date: 2006-12-16 00:06:56
Message-ID: 20061216000655.GI29167@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:24:46PM -0500, Ron wrote:
>ATM, the most we can say is that in a number of systems with modest
>physical IO subsystems

So I reran it on a 3.2GHz xeon with 6G RAM off a ramdisk; I/O ain't the
bottleneck on that one. Results didn't show didn't show any signficant
gains regardless of compilation options (results hovered around 12k
tps). If people want to continue this, I will point out that they should
make sure they're linked against the optimized libpq rather than an
existing one elsewhere in the library path. Beyond that, I'm done with
this thread. Maybe there are some gains to be found somewhere, but the
testing done thus far (while limited) is sufficient, IMO, to demonstrate
that compiler options aren't going to provide a blow-your-socks-off
dramatic performance improvement.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Frost 2006-12-16 03:24:05 opportunity to benchmark a quad core Xeon
Previous Message Alexander Staubo 2006-12-15 22:29:18 Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations