Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Date: 2006-12-13 03:41:03
Message-ID: 200612130341.kBD3f3V04774@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 17:30 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > * Have EXPLAIN ANALYZE highlight poor optimizer estimates
>
> > TODO updated:
> >
> > * Have EXPLAIN ANALYZE issue NOTICE messages when the estimated and
> > actual row counts differ by a specified percentage
>
> I don't think this is an improvement. The old wording describes a broad
> set of possible improvements. Your new text describes one way of
> implementing a subset of the former TODO wording.

Well, we can still do a broader implementation if we want it. Do you
have any suggestions? Basically, the more specific, the more likely we
will get someone to do it, and we can always add more details.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2006-12-13 03:57:02 8.1.5 release note
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-12-13 03:37:08 Re: Better management of mergejoinable operators