Re: Dynamic Tracing docs

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dynamic Tracing docs
Date: 2006-12-02 03:45:13
Message-ID: 200612020345.kB23jDk02723@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


Also, it is probably too late to add something of this magnitude this
close to wrapping the tarball, but I might be mistaken.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > This includes refactoring of some of the trace related GUC docs from
> > config.sgml, so its all in the one place.
>
> Why exactly is that a good idea? Since DTrace is Solaris-only, this
> almost seems like an attempt to hide non-Solaris-specific information
> where people won't look for it. Moreover, the point of config.sgml
> is to describe all the configuration parameters in one place. We do not
> need to have people second-guessing that decision for random subsets
> of the parameters.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-02 03:45:51 Re: Dynamic Tracing docs
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-12-02 01:49:14 Re: Dynamic Tracing docs

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-02 03:45:51 Re: Dynamic Tracing docs
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-12-02 01:49:14 Re: Dynamic Tracing docs