| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Collateral for LISA 06 |
| Date: | 2006-11-30 17:56:23 |
| Message-ID: | 200611300956.23861.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Roderick,
> As of 9:00 AM Pacific today the lisa_06.pdf looked pretty fuzzy in
> acroread ( Linux ) and was set for fast web viewing. The lines on the
> building had a good case of the jaggies.
>
> The p2_lisa.pdf looks very good.
>
> 8.2_copious.pdf looks pretty good. What weight of paper is planned for
> the printed version? This so I can put some samples of what we do
> together for review/evaluation. Since it is mostly black and white it
> would be tough to show off what we do. But if we can get company logos
> for the 'Dev' page it would really look nice.
Wait, do you really think you can get these printed for LISA? I'd need to
have them at the OmniTI office by Tuesday morning. That seems a little
ambitious ...
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | nhrcommu | 2006-11-30 18:06:42 | Re: Collateral for LISA 06 |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-11-30 17:48:40 | Re: Collateral for LISA 06 |