Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Subject: Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction
Date: 2006-11-30 04:29:11
Message-ID: 200611292029.12270.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance

Bruce,

> Someone should ask them to remove the article.

"Someone".

Um, *who* taught for Big Nerd Ranch for several years, Bruce?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-30 05:53:11 Re: Collateral for LISA 06
Previous Message Dan Langille 2006-11-30 01:57:17 PGCon brochure

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Lathrop 2006-11-30 22:59:27 Defining performance.
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-11-29 21:55:33 Re: Fw: [GENERAL] Including unique users in huge data